There is no doubt that if Mélenchon had lived in 1894, he would have become leader of the anti-Dreyfus clan. There are hardly any who are more hostile to Israel than he is. Perhaps among the Hamas terrorists, whom he loves, and certainly admires since he refuses to consider them as such. Like his loyal followers, Panot, Bompard and others. One of his fans, Obono, a member of parliament, even considers them to be resistance fighters. Against what? You have to wonder, as Israel has not paid much attention to these Islamists for some time. This has made it possible for them to carry out their murderous raids, emerging from underground tunnels built with money from Qatar, instead of passing on the benefits to the Gazans, whose only companion is poverty. Terrorists massacring on a scale rarely seen before, or perhaps in the days of the barbarians who swept in from the distant steppes, devastating everything in their path. Or more recently, in Rwanda.

   But back to our clan leader, the equivocal Mélenchon.

   Now he is accusing the President of the National Assembly, Yaël Braun-Pivet, of having gone to Israel to "camp in Tel Aviv and encourage the massacre", in a tweet under a photo showing a rally in support of the Palestinians, claiming that that was what France was all about. He was taking part in the demonstration with his supporters. He certainly likes to wallow in innuendo. And above all the pitiful use of Islamist vengeance, adding to the death threats that the President regularly receives. Perfidy as Politics. If this is his France, it resembles the dictatorships he admires, where anyone who disagrees with the chief is persecuted, imprisoned or killed. So it's easy to understand his complacency towards Hamas. And we can also understand why a majority of French people, along with the subservient parties who can't but, are losing interest in this political programme.

   Whether he likes it or not, the Hamas terrorists, like the Hezbollah terrorists who have ruined Lebanon, are in no way representative of the Palestinians, and it is a mistake to believe that supporting them will bring him new voters. And we can better understand his equivocal discourse. In the final analysis, this is his motivation, his determination to stick to indefensible positions. For him, it will be the tomb of history. He will be remembered only for the recurring mistakes he likes to make, supporting everything and its opposite.

   And there will be nothing more to say about it.

   The action to be taken is to work for two things: the creation of an independent Palestine, rid of the current barbarians, living in peace alongside Israel and making Gaza a province of the Hebrew State. The Gazans would become Arab citizens in the same way as those already living in Israel. For let's not delude ourselves, this tongue of land cannot survive like this and it is also in the interest of this people to free themselves from the yoke of the murderers who govern them by keeping them in precariousness and misery inversely proportional to the smallness of this territory.

   As for Israel, since the Nations that emerged from the Second World War created this country, it is only natural that it should defend its survival. And not by bombing civilians, who have been warned and encouraged to stay away from the scene of the fighting, but by bombing the barbarians there. Just as France, after the attacks on its soil, attacked the Daesh terrorists.